The Economic Potential of Ports and Regional Collaboration: Maritime Transportation Costs on International Trade

Lighhouse in Marquette
When lighthouses were
needed. 

I can print most pictures up to
poster size for $50
Frame or Unframed. I do
this as a hobby so 50% for charity
and 50% for me. 
Send me a message to the right
or my email. 
You may check out My Gallery
and Art Page
muradabel@gmail.com

We discuss often about the ways to improve economic activity and build a stronger society, both economically and socially. Of course, no single idea is going to solve every problem, and the concepts presented here are open for discussion. People can agree, disagree, or draw their own conclusions. Still, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of small factors that contribute to a strong economy, and lately I’ve been thinking more about some of the larger ones—particularly economic cluster theory and the way synergy develops through how companies interact-i.e. the microtransactions.

One major cost input factor is infrastructure. There is a reason governments and businesses often invest heavily in ports, railways, roads, shipping networks, and data systems. Infrastructure lowers the cost of transactions, increases the speed of movement and communication, and creates opportunities for new ideas, new businesses, and greater economic activity. In many cases, it also improves efficiency and reduces costs over time. It encourages greater investment in the area and region.

That is why I often think about Escanaba as a potentially strong location for expanded shipbuilding and port development. With targeted investment, the area appears to have the capability and capacity to support additional maritime activity. Such development could become a meaningful boost for the local economy. Whether the focus was recreational, commercial, or even military shipbuilding, the larger point is that the region already has advantages through its rail access, mining connections, metal stamping, and central location for import and export activity. Economically, it is at least worth examining whether expanding port operations would make sense.

For example, imagine building or modernizing a port that reduces transportation and shipping costs across the region. Pair that with efforts to encourage startups and strengthen a few anchor businesses that share suppliers and services. Smaller entrepreneurial firms could support those anchor companies while also revitalizing the downtown area. Encouraging startups, tourism, entertainment, social organizations, and community activities can help attract and retain talented people, especially young families and professionals who want to feel connected to a community.

One of the strengths of the area is that it already has a close-knit culture. People know one another, support one another, and the community has become increasingly welcoming to newcomers. They have a vested interest in making things work to help them, their children, and their grandchildren. That matters because economic development is not only about money or infrastructure—it is also about quality of life and creating places where people actually want to live.

A stronger port and shipping network could potentially increase trade by lowering transportation costs and improving logistics. Companies are already recognizing some of that potential. Amazon has expanded operations in the broader region, which reflects the importance of transportation access and delivery efficiency. Faster transit times and improved infrastructure can influence investment decisions and economic growth.

The larger question is whether expanded shipping and port activity could help spark more startups, innovation, and regional collaboration. Could local businesses work together more effectively through associations or shared branding? Could producers of maple syrup, beef, wood products, and other regional products find broader markets by coordinating their efforts? Could stronger infrastructure help create an economic cluster that reinforces itself over time?

Lots of questions....

These are not simple questions, and there are always tradeoffs to consider. But they are worth thinking about. Read the study below and consider how increased shipping activity or expanded port infrastructure might impact the regional economy. Would it create long-term benefits, encourage entrepreneurship, and strengthen the community, or would the costs outweigh the gains? You don't have to come to a conclusion yet. 

The Impact of Rising Maritime Transport Costs on International Trade: Estimation Using a Multi-Region General Equilibrium Model

• Examines how increases in maritime shipping costs affect international trade and the global economy.
• Uses a multi-region general equilibrium model to estimate economic impacts across countries and industries.
• Finds that higher shipping costs can reduce trade volumes and disrupt supply chains.
• Demonstrates that countries heavily dependent on imports and exports are more vulnerable to transportation cost increases.
• Highlights how rising freight expenses can contribute to inflationary pressures and reduced economic efficiency.
• Suggests that global trade networks are highly sensitive to disruptions in maritime transportation systems.
• Emphasizes the importance of resilient logistics systems and diversified trade strategies for economic stability.

Ferrari, E., Christidis, P., & Bolsi, P. (2023). The impact of rising maritime transport costs on international trade: Estimation using a multi-region general equilibrium model. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, 100985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100985

Subscribe to the Feed