Most people act with integrity and want to do the right thing (We are biologically and psychologically driven to collaborate. i.e. a society around core values). Society deserves a system that supports ethical behavior and protects those who are harmed. Justice should be applied fairly—regardless of race, religion, politics, power, or wealth. When people begin to feel that rules apply only to some, confidence in the system declines, even if it continues to function in many areas (Yet some are confused as to why).
Experiences of intimidation or misconduct like we find in the learning allegory Story of the Clan, especially when left unaddressed, can deepen that mistrust (i.e. knowing they were being rewarded before targeting people.). Poor actors went on for years and gained from misbehaviors despite widespread knowledge of coordination. When individuals report wrongdoing and are met with indifference or retaliation, it creates the perception that accountability is inconsistent. Even a few unchecked cases can have a broader impact, making it seem as though harmful behavior is tolerated or even encouraged.
As a society, there is a responsibility to challenge wrongdoing and uphold shared moral standards. Values like fairness, accountability, and respect for others are essential to maintaining a healthy system. Institutions should serve the common good, not narrow interests, and should reflect the principles they were built upon. There is greater good in encouraging what is just and right in the face of hate and corruption. The philosphical thought experiment the Story of the Clan highlights what happens when hate, corruption and social networks break down the moral order as a shared standard.
While problems may persist, there is also reason for cautious optimism. Public awareness, civic engagement, and a commitment to ethical leadership can drive reform. We must only encourage the best and brightest to come forward. They have the power to improve systems and undo (Highly vetted, connected, partisan and PAC paid should not be the standard. Democracy is more important than that.) Over time, pressure for transparency and accountability can lead to meaningful change. A system grounded in justice depends on people continuing to speak out, support one another, and work toward fairness for all.
The philosopher of democracy John Locke stated, "In the races of mankind and families in the world, there remains not to one above another...." leading to "All men are created equal....". One of the reasons why we protect freedom of speech and religion. Make your own opinion.
State of the State Courts 2025: Public Opinion Poll Findings Summary
- Public trust in state courts remains stable, with about 62% of Americans expressing confidence, and state courts continuing to be the most trusted branch of government.
- Perceptions of equal justice are declining, with only 44% believing courts provide equal justice for all, down significantly from previous years.
- Many Americans increasingly view the justice system as “two-tiered,” influenced by factors such as wealth, politics, race, and complexity of legal processes.
- Younger individuals (especially ages 18–29) tend to have more positive views of courts, seeing them as fair, transparent, and innovative.
- Public skepticism toward artificial intelligence in courts is high, with many believing AI may do more harm than good.
- Concerns about judicial safety are rising, with about half of respondents believing threats against judges and public officials have increased.
- Cost and complexity of legal processes are major barriers to access to justice, contributing to dissatisfaction with the system.
- Strong support exists for legal education reform, including more practical training for lawyers and changes to the bar exam to better reflect real-world skills.
- The public calls for greater community engagement and transparency from courts to improve trust and accessibility.
National Center for State Courts. (2025). State of the state courts: 2025 public opinion poll findings. https://www.ncsc.org/resources-courts/state-state-courts-2025-public-opinion-poll-findings



