 |
A philosopher in modern times. Encouraging people to believe in justice and its positive impact on society. We swear oaths to our values and built institutions to protect those values. Praise where they do well and encourage development when they are lacking.
|
I’ve been thinking about what corruption looks like — and about the potential solutions that remain undiscovered or discussed but never implemented. When corruption is uncovered, we have a responsibility to challenge it, even when such misconduct is protected by entrenched systems or “clan courts.” But it goes deeper than that. The real danger lies in people accepting corruption as normal, as a sanctioned outcome of decision-making, which undermines the very purpose of our existence. People are quick to hate and engage in corruption but really slow to correct when it is discovered.
I’ve been using a hypothetical, philosophical thought experiment to explore what corruption would look like in a system with a complete justice default. Certainly, there are those who make decisions for financial gain — putting vulnerable people at risk, engaging in sexual misconduct, bullying, retaliating against whistleblowers, or deliberately harming victims. Let’s imagine that people reported these behaviors, only for them to be swept under the rug. Worse still, those who spoke out were placed on target lists designed to silence moral conscience and maximize harm. A clear entitlement, intent to harm, and social pecking order. People damaged victim's employment prospects, social networks, allegedly followed underage girls, targeted adults, undermined a sense of safety just to ensure they and their friends received rewards and to keep the corruption networks sheilded from accountability. The patterns of poor behaviors of some members spanning years and many victims. In some cases the court was aware and some have dubbed them "clan courts".
We should never allow or foster such behaviors. When institutions tolerate this, people who believe in their true purpose — those who reject discrimination based on race, religion, politics, or any of the divisive “-isms” — are often treated as undesirables (They are actually the one's we want in society. Develop more!). When they are minorities and this pattern of misuse of authority continues openly, a class of second-tier citizens emerges — people who will never receive justice, no matter how blatant the wrongdoing. If you ask the many people in this group they would know what it is like to be an out-group member while those in the in-group recognized no such difference. The misbehaviors continue because people believe in enforcing these differences where we could instead be indivizible (We should always seek to be unified in certain values and avoid division by poor actors, politicians, or officials.)
Personally, I believe all people, regardless of race or religion, have inherent value. Great nations are built by drawing on the best and brightest, not by silencing or excluding them (Freedom of speech and religion being fundamental to who we are.). When that doesn’t happen, there is always room to improve. Even if those who benefit from wrongdoing don't see the need. Improvement is the name of the game. Yes the mistakes of the past have created chaos on people but ensuring we are doing what is right going forward is a must and correcting the wrong doing is a signal that a hypothetical clan based court is going to try and serve society the way they were expected and commissioned.
This reflection is meant to encourage those who experience injustice because of their perceived place in society (Value should be by merit and not intentional misperceptions). There are still people who believe in fairness and integrity and who will continue to fight for both (They see the value in different types of peoples and the protections of each). Sometimes they take risks because others were negligent of the victims of the past and present in a way that created new victims. The best and brightest — not merely the most connected — should rise to leadership. Hate and corruption have no place among us, and those who protect or enable such misconduct stand on the wrong side of history, whether or not their lenses is wide enough to perceive it. Rank or status does not free anyone from the duty to uphold what is sacred and just.
I found this an interesting piece to think about and how corruption might be normalized in some places. More importantly its impact when written and unwritten values are sometimes different. It also discusses in some ways how to restore trust and that is important where trust is declining and seems to be directly related to poor decisions. The goal is to build the highest functioning systems we can and ensure that we are developing society the best we can based on our shared oaths be drawing word and deed closer together.
Court performance and citizen attitudes toward fighting corruption