One could say that executives and entrepreneurs build their success through the quality of their decision-making, which ultimately shapes long-term outcomes. Resources, social connections, and finances are all important, but it is the decision-making capacity of an organization’s leadership that most strongly influences sustained performance. Consistent high performance leads to recognition, credibility, and long-term stability. Gaining a deeper understanding of how hot and cold cognitive processes affect decision-making can strengthen consistency, performance, and leadership ability.
Utilizing resources to meet market needs is rarely a straightforward path—it often requires a series of adaptive decisions and continual adjustments. Much of an executive’s day is spent putting out fires and managing crises. These rapid responses rely on what is known as
hot process thinking—quick, emotion-driven decision-making under pressure. However, each of these quick decisions should align with a broader,
cold process strategic framework to ensure long-term effectiveness. Why flail in the water when you can have a sense of direction to swim ? The
hot should serve the goals established by the
cold.
There is a clear distinction between emergency decisions made on the spot and those derived from deliberate, long-term planning. Successful short-term decisions often depend on a solid foundation of knowledge and accumulated experience that allows leaders to make fast, intuitive, and strategic choices—even without complete information. The more knowledgeable your internal team, the better they can contribute their knowledge to make decisions. Likewise, the more experience and knowledge you gain throughout your career, the better you become at making decisions that generate new options and opportunities—assuming you remain a lifelong learner and avoid rigidity.
Differences in how team members view issues, explore problems, and draw conclusions can lead to greater insight and improved decision outcomes. Having a team of independent thinkers encourages creativity and innovation that would be unlikely derived from a single person or source. While business decisions are typically guided by strategy and logic, variance in individual perspectives enhances discovery and fosters better solutions (Hitt & Tyler, 1991). Executives on the same team may arrive at different answers—and that diversity of thought is a strength that improves long-term performance.
Further, executives often make decisions under uncertainty, with limited information and time pressure. The ability to balance one’s thinking—whether or not supported by others’ input—requires awareness of one’s cognitive and emotional processes. Emotional factors, both hot and cold, influence our choices beyond intelligence or reasoning alone. Understanding how these two processes interact is crucial for improving decision quality (Colautti, Antonietti, & Iannello, 2022).
One essential caveat: leaders must possess the humility and willingness to listen to others’ insights, weigh them against internal and external data, and evaluate their practical value. Openness to new information enhances understanding and fosters collaboration and trust (Kluger & Itzchakove, 2022). This mindset supports engagement, coordination, and overall organizational success. The best cold process knows how to gain, undersand, and utilize a collective of knowledge to enhance hot process thinking.
A Few Tips for Balancing Hot and Cold Processes
-
Develop a clear long-term organizational plan that defines your mission, capabilities, and direction.
-
Before making quick decisions, consider how they align with long-term goals.
-
Even under pressure, strive to move toward strategic objectives—progress, however small, is better than stagnation.
-
Consult with others when developing long-term strategies. Diverse viewpoints generate insight and lasting solutions.
-
Delegate effectively, relying on your team’s expertise for short-term decisions while providing clear guidelines.
-
Reflect daily on what went well, what could improve, and how to better handle similar challenges in the future.
Hitt, Michael & Tyler, Beverly. (1991). Strategic Decision Models: Integrating Different Perspectives. Strategic Management Journal. 12. 327 - 351. 10.1002/smj.4250120502.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227896490_Strategic_Decision_Models_Integrating_Different_Perspectives
Kluger, A. and Itzchakov, G. (January 2022). The Power of Listening at Work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 9(1). DOI:
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091013
Colautti L., Antonietti A. & Iannello P. (2022). Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective. Brain Sci. 2022 Oct 2;12(10):1335. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101335. PMID: 36291269; PMCID: PMC9599766. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9599766/
