Corruption is a disease that infects society. Ethical officials, leaders, and citizens alike generally understand that corruption harms not only individuals but the broader functioning of a free society. It disrupts the fair exchange of commerce, ideas, and human connection.
Yet, despite its clear dangers, corruption isn’t always treated as a pressing concern. In some cases, even when misconduct is evident, individuals go out of their way to shield it—ignoring its repeated patterns and the victims it creates.
The risks to society are real.
 |
A philosopher preaching against corruption and hate.
Corruption has a long tail impact so
good character should be fostered.
"Character is destiny"-Heraclitus
|
Let us explore a learning narrative:
The Story of the Clan. In this hypothetical, philosophical thought experiment, we encounter hampered by clear corruption and hate-based behaviors (
The definition of those an open debate. The law and philososphy may say different things.). Over the years, numerous victims emerged—ranging from survivors of sexual violence to those targeted by attempts at social or cultural "cleansing."
Human and civil rights were mocked openly, while the law was twisted to incentivize and protect wrongdoing. Each time a new instance of corruption surfaced, decision-makers affiliated with the Clan blocked investigations and redirected scrutiny onto the victims, whistleblowers, or witnesses. The cracks in the moral foundation of the law—and its purpose—became painfully clear.
The Story of the Clan is not a literal account but a tool for exploring the moral importance of challenging corruption. Most people believe in values like fairness, justice, liberty, and human dignity—and many have pledged to uphold them. But when individuals or institutions manipulate the law while ignoring its ethical foundation, society suffers.
Risks of Ignoring Corruption
-
Law Becomes a Tool of Injustice
When people realize the law is being misused—intentionally shielding serious crimes—it loses its perceived legitimacy (..law has an important purpose in society to ensure certain rules that benefit everyone are followed). Corruption erodes faith in legal systems meant to protect society.
-
More Victims Come Forward
Attempts to suppress victims often backfire. When more survivors speak out, the extent of wrongdoing becomes undeniable. It's especially immoral when whistleblowers and concerned citizens are targeted for trying to do the right thing.
-
Impact on Social and Economic Health
Corruption undermines prosperity. In our example, once the community began challenging corruption, it reversed a 20-year decline and moved toward a healthier, more vibrant, and economically thriving future (...using a long ethical exploratory story). In such societies we may see crime declining, trust rising, and greater social and economic engagement.
-
Erosion of Public Trust
Trust in public institutions depends on the belief that officials will uphold the law fairly. When corruption is overlooked or covered up, even by those in positions of power, public confidence deteriorates. Encouraging greater engagement and greater support relies in part on that integrity and wisdom of decision makers.
Civic Responsibility
It’s vital to be a good citizen by reporting corruption and crime. While some reports are taken seriously, others may be ignored—but documenting misconduct is still important. Yes, retaliation is a risk, especially in environments where corruption has been normalized by some (in this case Clan members). But there remains a greater responsibility to society. People who swear certain oaths and pledges would be helping to fulfill them by reporting corruption and other wrongdoing (It is a duty despite the risks. It helps define a persons soul and values. Keep in mind this is a philosophical piece. Soul and values will be discussed later.).
In The Story of the Clan, we see how protecting corruption has long-term consequences. Each new victim reflects the unresolved, foundational issues that continue to fester.
Philosophical Questions
-
Is it important for members of society to report corruption and hate crimes?
Who do they report it to? Are these entities independent, and are they capable of meaningful reform if crimes are well known, documented, and verified? Where are they collected, who reviews, and who makes changes? Does data and trend matter? (If you don't have a mechanism to collect, study and investigate then complaints have little to no impact. In some incidents some may not want to collect or understand.)
-
Do institutions function best when regularly improved?
Are our systems operating at their highest state, or is there still room for growth, correction, and reform? (It is ok to say no we don't need change but it should be a logical one. Most research indicates that positive upward change is important so I would be interested in seeing reports that say change isn't helpful. The key to understanding is to not make quick conclusions and be willing to accept a variety of information that helps define a problem and provide a possible solution. Never start with a solution or an answer if you don't know what the questions are. Take your time and understand.)
-
How does corruption impact free exchange and core liberties?
Does protecting corruption undermine life, liberty, freedom of speech, religion, and economic opportunity? One may think of the essential purpose of law and institutions in preserving those essential universal values. Are there economic impacts if there are hamperings to free exchange or core liberties?
-
Can purging corruption help good officials thrive?
Do fair systems allow the best and brightest to serve with integrity? What happens when corruption is ignored—how does it shape internal cultures? How do those cultures impact employees, public servants and others? Do cultures have impact on organizational success? Will there be more victims and who is responsible for that? Should it be the victims or those who shield corruption and hate?
-
Are ethics and shared values necessary for a healthy society?
How do we encourage officials to uphold these values? And what does it signal when they don’t? Do ethics really matter and who says that honesty and fairness actually improve society? What happens if values are not shared or ethics is not a concern? (Again...it is ok to say they are not necessary or needed but one should support that belief. In general, conventional wisdom says that shared commitment to certain fundamental missions, objectives, values, etc. lead to coordination and increase in broad based performance.)
Historical and Philosophical Roots
If you're a history enthusiast, you’ll recall that many of the U.S. founding fathers (and let's not forget the mothers) were deeply concerned with corruption.
-
Thomas Jefferson stressed removing corruption and restoring first principles.
-
George Washington warned against outside influence.
-
James Madison proposed that ambition should counteract ambition to prevent abuse.
-
Jefferson also emphasized the role of an informed citizenry in protecting the republic.
Religious and secular philosophers alike have acknowledged the importance of universal principles—those that uphold truth, dignity, justice, and the common good.
Final Thoughts
This story is meant for learning and reflection. It doesn’t claim to be definitive, but it does help spark discussion and critical thought about corruption, ethics, economic impact, social growth, and the responsibilities we all share.
You are free to agree or disagree as well as bring forward alternative perspectives. What matters most is that you took a moment to think, question, and come to conclusions that reflect your values. That conclusion is something you own as a person and defines you and your values. In some ways it defines your soul (No judgement either way).
Whether you find yourself asking new questions or reaffirming old beliefs, you've engaged in the process of thought—and that’s where growth begins. Time answers all questions......
