 |
A person lecturing on the importance
of liberty and preservation of rights
during sociological transitions.
|
Understanding Justice, Trust, and the Impact of CorruptionThe justice system is critical because it influences many other aspects of society—our choices, our sense of safety, our ideas of fairness, and the concept of a level playing field. Society holds certain expectations for how officials and the courts should uphold shared values, as codified in our laws. When those expectations are not met—thankfully in what we hope are rare cases—it can come as a shock. There are mechanisms to bringing back into the fold of good judgement those rogue actors and ambassadors of democratic decay bring (Take with a grain of rhetorical thought.)
What follows is a theoretical, hypothetical, and philosophical learning thought experiment designed to explore the dynamics of hate and corruption. Through this exploration, we have already discovered meaningful insights and possible solutions.
The Decline in Trust
Let’s begin by acknowledging that a downward trend in public trust toward the justice system is not a positive one. No matter how you slice and dice it, those types of trends should be avoided. We should encourage decision-makers to arrest this decline and implement necessary reforms when such reforms help the whole of society. Sometimes, small adjustments in practice and tone can make a big difference. In other cases, more significant interventions may be required to halt systemic problems.
It’s important to recognize that understanding the purpose of the law can differ from mastering its technicalities. There's a risk when the system draws human capital primarily from a highly educated and socialized pool of attorneys—experts who are trained as technicians. While this expertise is vital, it should be complemented by a deeper understanding of the broader philosophical and ethical foundations of justice. That perspective can bring necessary context to legal decision-making.
Report Finds Trust in Courts Declining
Americans Pass Judgement on Courts
A Learning Case: The Story of the Clan
In our thought experiment, The Story of the Clan explores what happens when a system fails—and not by accident, but by poor actor design. It describes a hypothetical scenario where the justice system defaults to protect and reward perpetrators. The story includes disturbing elements: hate-driven rumors, coordinated abuse, systemic corruption, isolation of the vulnerable, character assassination, suppression of speech and religion, and efforts to maintain segregationist worldviews (We might have seen this more like a 100 years ago).
This imagined example operated without appropriate local checks and balances. The system overlooked victims, retaliated against the innocent, and ignored whistleblowers. Culture and process favored those in power—those in the Clan—rather than the rule of law (Imagine the self-entitled dark triad traits of influencers that would cause and allow such behaviors. Certainly not the type that should be in any leadership role.).
Eventually, the situation became unsustainable. Some brave individuals stood up to the corruption, despite personal risks. They shifted the focus away from protecting bad actors and toward re-aligning with the fundamental purpose of justice. However, full accountability remained elusive, in part due to efforts to block investigations into perpetrators while pursuing those who simply raised concerns. Historically, such imbalances have sometimes served as precursors to even more serious crimes. (That sounds grim—but we will aim for a positive conclusion. It doesn't morph into a much larger issue because there are those who swore oaths simply said "no" and protected themselves and others while bad actors retaliated over and over with immunity and impunity. In our horrific example, it appeared the judge incentivized the perpetrators but the error of improprer symbolic anchorage was eventually corrected.)
The Economic Impact of Hate and Corruption
Part of this thought experiment is to explore the economic consequences of corruption and hate. These forces distort markets, misallocate resources, and create inefficiencies that hurt everyone—not just the direct victims. The implications of blind eye justice are much more than many decision makers can fathom from the vantage point in which they were educated and socialized. For 20 years our theoretical community declined until new leadership was brought forward and corruption was directly challenged.
It’s essential to clarify: one can fully support the many good leaders and decision makers who operate within the Constitution and the intended purpose of their roles. The vast majority of these professionals do the right thing, often under difficult circumstances. They have respect and this is why they have been supported. They deserve fair compensation, respect, and encouragement. When they can't, won't, or don't have the mental or moral conscious capacity to do the right thing is when problems arise.
However, those who abuse their positions, enable corruption, or turn a blind eye to injustice should not be legally protected in the name of preserving the status quo. Some administrators may not fully appreciate the broader impact their role has on society. But it's worth remembering: people outside the justice system have just as much ability—and just as much right—to judge what is right and wrong. After all, these institutions exist to serve the public, not clans or themselves. Let us be happy that for the most part they don't. When we serve the institution then something is misaligned. Freedom of speech, religion, human/civil rights, and the Constitution should always be upheld. Let us give honor to the vast majority that do. They are heroes of our society.
Checks and balances are essential to remind public servants who they are accountable to—and why. Thank God we have many who do the right thing and still believe in what our forefathers and mothers believed. Failure to do that leads to economic and social decline as resources are misallocated to people who hold values similar to "The Clan".
James Madison,
Opens in new tab"Equal laws protecting equal rights—the best guarantee of loyalty and love of country."
Love her and love her dearly as a beacon of light.
How Corruption Impacts Economic Growth
*This is a hypothetical philosophical theoretical learning thought experiment on the impact of hate and corruption. Take as a grain of salt and feel free to agree or disagree. It is meant to generate deeper thought.
