Problems arise when unofficial beliefs—such as ideas of superiority based on religion, politics, or identity—begin to influence official actions (Mix power with congnitive distortion and you got a real issue.) When this happens, people may start treating those outside their group differently, which can lead to unequal outcomes. If this occurs over a long time it will have a long tail negative impact difficult for scientists to measure (It can be imperfectly measured if you look at broader sociological trends.). These dynamics can also have economic consequences, because societies function best when people share core values such as fairness, accountability, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and respect for the rule of law. 👆
A philosophical allegory called The Story of the Clan helps illustrate this point. In the story, widespread injustice occurs because of bigotry, extremism, corruption, and discrimination based on race, religion, and political views. Those who are harmed have little recourse because of the fear of retaliation prevents them from reporting wrongdoing. Even when the harm becomes known, those responsible refuse to correct it, remove incentives for misconduct, or assist the victims whose futures were diminished, ultimately harming the broader good of society. As the story unfolds, it becomes clear that corruption is more widespread than initially believed and that additional victims were morally dimissed or undermined. Others complained of similar Good Old Boy networks and retaliation only to have their comcerns ignored. In some instances, perpetrators are rewarded while misinformation is spread about the victims, contributing to their dehumanization.
However, the story also shows that positive change is possible, as the sacrifice and courage of individuals and the integrity of oath-faithful officials eventually inspire others to pursue fairness and rebuild a commitment to justice and shared values. Although it can be difficult to change the minds of those who have decided their answers before hearing the questions (pre-cognitive bias), people can still foster greater unity even when decision makers pursue their own agendas, and the story ultimately points toward an adaptive outcome in which lessons learned help protect future victims where past harm resulted from biased and selective thinking. In other words, while they cheated victims, They also cheated society creating a long-tail of outcomes. Further, they also know that people are aware and that limits future wrongdoing due to fear of being exposed. Awareness changes things and improves deeper understanding of justice and the necessity of togetherness and shared values. A hard sell in some connected circles but the people know the benefits of a sense of community and shared paths forward.
This is an interesting piece on access to justice and democracy,
Access to justice and economic development: Evidence from an international panel dataset.
The study examines the relationship between access to justice (ATJ) and economic growth using an international panel dataset covering multiple countries from 1970–2019.
-
Researchers created a new dataset measuring access to justice by analyzing the number of judges per capita across countries.
-
The analysis uses econometric methods (including instrumental variable techniques and dynamic panel models) to address potential causality and endogeneity issues.
-
Results show that greater access to justice has a significant positive effect on economic growth across both developed and developing countries.
-
The economic benefits of improved judicial access are stronger in poorer countries, suggesting legal capacity may be especially important for development.
-
Access to justice supports growth partly by increasing government accountability and improving overall institutional quality.
-
The positive relationship between access to justice and growth appears independent of factors such as legal origin, rule of law traditions, or level of democracy.
Deseau, A., Levai, A., & Schmiegelow, M. (2025). Access to justice and economic development: Evidence from an international panel dataset. European Economic Review, 172, 104947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104947
