The Story of the Clan is a hypothetical, philosophical, theoretical thought experiment of a complete failure of justice that was eventually corrected. Not through moral awakening but through practical necessity. It drove a spike into perceptions of human and civil rights, exposing the profound risks of tolerating hate, extremism, and long-term corruption. This account does not apply to the many good officials who upheld their oaths and ultimately overcame the influence of embedded extreme wrongdoing. Rather, it serves as a hypothetical, philosophical, and theoretical thought experiment—a means to explore worst-case scenarios and their generational impact on society. To learn how to build the best society means studying the best practices and where we have room for improvement to maximize opportunities.
 |
A philosopher objecting to harming others and engaging in wrongdoing. A moral tale. |
Ultimately, justice does not belong to any single person, entity, or institution. It is a philosophical ideal—one that may never be fully realized in this world or within our lifetimes—but that does not mean we should cease striving for it. The
intent to harm is the opposite force: a deliberate act that seeks to create injustice and destruction. When harmful individuals place children, women, the elderly, and others at risk for their own gain, they alter the lives of generations to come. They steal human capital from society, leaving it weaker. The intent to harm shows a lack of respect for human life, other's perspective or for the law itself. It was only through the ignorance or complicity of others that such misdeeds were allowed to persist for years, leaving countless victims in their wake.
The concern lies in the kind of thinking that justifies any crime against those who are “different”—whether by religion, race, politics, or any other measure (Research calls it the out-group) or those they can exploit like the female victims (Corruption and hate are often associated as a pattern of thinking.). Hatred and corruption allowed criminal patterns to thrive unchecked for years, producing victim after victim. Eventually, even the clan court knew the truth yet failed to fulfill its duty to protect the public (i.e. complaints of secret backroom agreements). Over time, it became clear that the witnesses, whistleblowers, and victims sidelined had been right all along. Despite the clan court’s repeated attempts to shield its own, it ultimately lost both the argument and its integrity (In theory).
Does discovery make much difference? Not really but it depends on what lessons people derive. Turning a blind eye robbed society of good people and their contributions, all because of distorted beliefs. Without correction or protection, these same behaviors will reemerge elsewhere, creating new victims. Another clan, another ideology, another "ism". Unwritten rules often carry more power than the law itself. The deeper question is: Who is considered part of society, and who is deemed unwanted—especially by those least qualified to judge others, let alone themselves?
Perhaps new leadership, grounded in moral integrity and committed to helpful checks and balances, could help. Maybe not. People will still cheat. Yet, such leadership demonstrates at least a commitment to upholding the social contract. This is why I advocate for the next generation of the best and brightest to come forward and take leading roles to strengthen institutions and further their missions. It has been the same process every generation and that is a necessary process to ensure things change. Our founding fathers/mothers discussed the need for fluidity of change.
If you’re asking my opinion, I believe people should be judged on merit—not on superficial traits such as race, religion, politics, etc.. The story, then, is a moral one meant to inspire reflection and discussion. Those who disagree with fairness—or even the methods of achieving it—are free to hold alternative opinions. Methods often cause more disagreement than the general idea of fairness itself. I work from the assumption that we should act in alignment with our professed values and aim to help the greatest number of people. Laws matter because they uphold those values, though their application often depends on personal judgment. In this learning example, having a refined moral palate is more helpful.
This moral story of legal and moral pesuasion is both interesting and instructive—it sheds light on how systems can fail and what that failure reveals about human nature. I’m not religious in the traditional sense, though I believe all religions teach us something about values. I can respect the moral lesson in this tale. Whether we draw from the ethics of religion, logic of science or the explorations of philosophy, all paths seem to lead to the same truth: a sense of order—one best seen when we learn to view the world from different perspectives and find inherent value in each other (In theory).
Consequences for Corruption for Generations