Adsterra Horizonal Banner

Friday, April 10, 2026

The Golf Industry Statistics Long Term Growth-Affordability (Mission Bay Golf Course and Loma Club Good Choices)

Mission Bay Golf

Golf is a great way to get outside, stay active, and enjoy the elements—whether that’s sunshine or even a light rain. While some people see it as an expensive sport, the cost really depends on how you choose to play and who you play with. If you’re trying to keep up with highly competitive or high-end golfers, your going to buy the latest and greatest. But if your goal is simply to enjoy the game, it can be much more affordable.

Basic golf clubs can often be purchased for around $300, and even less if you’re willing to look for secondhand options at places like thrift stores. Higher end full golf set runs around $1000. It’s possible to put together a full set very cheaply, which works well for casual play or for lending to friends. Playing nine holes is also relatively affordable at many courses—typically around $20–$25 if you walk, or $30–$35 with a cart.

Joining a golf club is another option, though it may not make sense for everyone. If you travel frequently or don’t play often, paying per round at public courses can be more practical. Many private clubs in some areas also allow public play, making memberships less necessary. That said, memberships can offer social benefits and access to additional amenities like pools or gyms, which may add value if you use them regularly.

The golf industry itself is growing, with more people getting involved in both traditional play and practice activities like driving ranges. Access to facilities can vary, though—some days it’s easy to walk in and play or practice, while other times tournaments or events may limit availability. Planning ahead can help avoid those issues.

Two golf courses I like in San Diego include Mission Bay Golf Course and the Loma Club

If you’re curious about how the game is evolving and growing, it’s worth taking a look at some recent industry statistics.

Golf Industry Growth And Participation Trends (2025–2026)

  • U.S. golf participation continues to grow, with over 29 million on-course players in 2025 and more than 48 million total participants (including off-course formats), reflecting long-term, sustained growth rather than a short-term pandemic spike
  • The industry has reached a higher “new normal,” with eight consecutive years of participation increases and more people engaging through both traditional play and technology-driven experiences like simulators
  • Rounds played have hit record levels multiple times in recent years despite fewer golf courses, indicating stronger demand and higher utilization of existing facilities
  • Diversity is increasing, with record participation among women and people of color, including over 8 million women and girls playing on-course and significant gains since 2019
  • Off-course experiences (e.g., driving ranges, simulators) serve as key entry points, with about two-thirds of beginners first engaging with golf outside traditional courses

National Golf Foundation. (2026, January 30). Golf’s state-of-industry in 3 minutes. https://www.ngf.org/short-game/golfs-state-of-industry-in-3-minutes-3/

Point Loma Assembly Supports Their Community, Arts and Education (National Philanthropic Trends)

(Illustrative Only)

Charitable giving plays an important role in strengthening society and improving the lives of others. As economic disparities grow between wealthier and lower-income populations, differences in access to opportunities, education, healthcare, and quality of life become more pronounced. 

Giving back—whether through time, resources, or financial contributions—helps bridge some of these gaps and supports more equitable communities.

Americans are widely recognized for their generosity, contributing to a broad range of causes including education, food security, healthcare, community programs, and cultural or recreational initiatives. These contributions not only address immediate needs but also foster long-term social stability and well-being.

One example of local civic engagement is Point Loma Assembly, located in Point Loma. This organization is involved in community-focused efforts that aim to make a positive impact at the local level. Highlighting groups like this can encourage others to reflect on ways they might contribute to their own communities.

Exploring organizations and reviewing research on philanthropy trends in the United States can provide useful insight into how giving shapes society—and how individuals can play a role in that ongoing effort.

Consider donating to the Assembly or one of those recipient organizations below. 

Point Loma Assembly

Started in 1911 "Our mission is to promote literary, social, educational, philanthropic, civic, and artistic work and to restore and maintain the building at 3035 Talbot Street." Point Loma Assembly Webpage

Recipient Organizations:

The MAAC Summer Camps: "The Dorothea Laub Music & Arts Center (The MAAC) is your one-stop shop for kids music & arts activities, classes & camps."

The Liberty Station Art District: "The mission of Arts District Liberty Station is to activate a dynamic and historic campus where enriching cultural experiences, impactful learning opportunities, and inspiring events are accessible to all."

Visions Museum of Textile Art: "To inspire a world where textile art ignites curiosity, fosters understanding, educates, and empowers individuals to connect deeply with themselves, each other, and the broader cultural fabric of society."

Classics 4 Kids: " Transforming children’s lives through innovative educational concerts and music programs that inspire learning, creativity, and community."

YMCA SD Swim "To put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all."

Peninsula Community Senior Center: :"Peninsula Community Senior Center Empowers Senior Independence through unique transportation service and robust social activities."

Charitable Giving Statistics in the US
  • total U.S. charitable giving reached $592.5 billion in 2024, with individuals contributing the majority at $392.45 billion (about two-thirds of all donations)
  • foundations gave $109.81 billion, corporations $44.4 billion, and bequests $45.84 billion, with religion receiving the largest share of donations (23%)

National Philanthropic Trust. (2026). Charitable giving statistics. https://www.nptrust.org/philanthropic-resources/charitable-giving-statistics/

Group Think and the Darkside of Conformity and Isolation

Groupthink occurs in many organizations when decision-making groups rely too heavily on similar opinions and fail to consider alternative perspectives. When individuals share similar backgrounds or think in the same way, the group loses the diversity needed to fully understand complex situations. This can lead to strategic misalignment with the external environment, which may worsen over time as misdirected decisions compound. At some point, execytuve leaders must decide whether continuing down the same path is viable or if a new strategy is necessary.

Power dynamics and social pressure can create a false sense of agreement within a group. While consensus may appear strong, it can become overly narrow and disconnected from reality. Important information may be ignored or filtered out, leaving the group with an information network too limited to handle complex challenges. As a result, the decision-making capacity of the group becomes insufficient.

The consequences of groupthink can be significant. Organizations may lose money, damage stakeholder relationships, or fail to achieve their objectives. In extreme cases, especially during periods of rapid environmental change, organizations may bankrupt/collapse if their leadership cannot adapt. When knowledgeable individuals feel discouraged to share their perspectives, the flow of new ideas slows down or stops entirely.

Warning signs of misalignment often include growing external pressure (market), increasing internal dissent (turnover rates), and a rise in costly mistakes (lower ROI). Decisions and actions begin to conflict with the realities of the environment (Strategic misalignment). Larger organizations may be able to absorb these issues temporarily, but over time they weaken, particularly as more agile and strategically aligned competitors gain ground (market gain).

There are several ways to reduce groupthink. Assigning a “devil’s advocate” to challenge assumptions can introduce alternative viewpoints. Effective leadership is critical—leaders should actively listen to diverse perspectives and evaluate ideas based on merit rather than agreement. Building teams with varied skills, experiences, and viewpoints also strengthens decision-making. Additionally, formal checks and balances, along with a strong appreciation for intellectual contributions, can help maintain objectivity.

Taking time to carefully evaluate decisions and consider multiple possible solutions leads to better outcomes. When groups deliberately explore different options, they are more likely to arrive at well-informed and effective decisions.

If groupthink is not addressed, fewer individuals will feel comfortable speaking up, and decision quality will decline. In many cases, problems remain undetected until they have already caused significant damage.

 Groupthink

  • Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon in which the desire for group harmony or consensus overrides critical thinking and realistic evaluation of alternatives.
  • It commonly occurs in highly cohesive groups, especially when members prioritize agreement and unity over independent judgment.
  • Key conditions that contribute to groupthink include strong group cohesion, isolation from outside opinions, directive leadership, and high-stress decision-making environments.
  • Symptoms include self-censorship, illusion of unanimity, pressure to conform, and rationalization of poor decisions.
  • Groupthink can lead to flawed decision-making, such as incomplete analysis of alternatives, ignoring risks, and failure to consider backup plans.
  • The concept was developed by Irving Janis, who studied major policy failures and found that suppressed dissent contributed to poor outcomes.
  • Preventing groupthink involves encouraging open discussion, assigning critical evaluators, promoting diverse perspectives, and having leaders remain neutral during decision-making.

NYU Steinhardt Applied Psychology OPUS. (n.d.). Groupthink. Retrieved from https://wp.nyu.edu/steinhardt-appsych_opus/groupthink/

Thursday, April 9, 2026

Short Bursts of Exercise Lead to Significant Health Benefits

(Illustrative Only)
A person working out
in their office

Fitness and health make a meaningful difference in everyday life. It doesn’t matter whether you’re a high-powered executive, a veteran, a stay-at-home parent, working in the skilled trades, or currently unemployed—regular physical activity helps reduce the risk of cardiovascular and other chronic health conditions. Beyond physical benefits, it also supports mental health over the long term, improving how you think, process information, and handle challenges.

When your body is functioning well—receiving enough oxygen and maintaining good blood flow—your overall performance tends to improve, including cognitive function. This can contribute to clearer thinking and better decision-making. Even short bursts of daily vigorous activity can have a noticeable impact. That might be something simple like walking up stairs or more structured exercise like going to the gym.

Consistency matters. If you spend much of your day sitting, try breaking it up with short periods of movement. For example, doing five minutes of activity each hour—such as push-ups, sit-ups, yoga, Tai Chi, dancing, or any activity you enjoy—can add up. Over an eight- or nine-hour day, that totals about 40–45 minutes of exercise, which is comparable to a typical gym session.

The key is to integrate movement into your routine in a way that works for you. Small, consistent efforts throughout the day can lead to significant benefits over time.

I have a fitness trainers license and yoga license so if you need help please send me a message to the right.  Or leave a comment and I will reach out. 

Volume vs intensity of physical activity and risk of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular chronic diseases

  • Higher total physical activity volume was associated with approximately 20–40% lower risk of cardiovascular disease compared to low activity levels.
  • Individuals who incorporated vigorous-intensity activity showed an additional ~10–20% reduction in cardiovascular risk beyond moderate activity alone.
  • Short bouts of vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity (VILPA), lasting 1–2 minutes, were linked to up to ~30% lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.
  • Participants engaging in higher-intensity activity had about a 15–25% lower risk of non-cardiovascular chronic diseases, including metabolic conditions.
  • Dose–response relationships indicated that even small increases in activity (e.g., 10–15 additional minutes per day) produced measurable reductions in disease risk.

Wei, J., et al. (2026). Volume vs intensity of physical activity and risk of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular chronic diseases. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag168

Wednesday, April 8, 2026

Shifting Views on Energy Issues and the Value of Diverse Energy Sources

Energy is extremely important. It powers our homes, businesses, industries, and transportation. Decisions about energy use should also consider environmental impacts, costs, technology development, resilience, local development, etc. 

Energy diversity is essential for stability and resilience. Relying too heavily on a single source, such as oil, can lead to higher costs during supply disruption, especially during geopolitical conflicts. Alternative sources—like solar, wind, nuclear, and experimental fusion—can help create a more sustainable energy system over the long term. Let us not forget coal and hydro. Having multiple energy inputs also helps prevent problems like power outages during extreme weather.

On a personal level, it makes sense to combine different energy sources, such as gas, solar, or backup fuels like wood or LP gas. On a national scale, the principle is the same, though more complex. Surveys indicate that people are increasingly interested in hybrid vehicles and using electricity to enhance fuel efficiency, showing a shift toward more efficient and diverse energy use. It might be a growing trend.

When considering energy choices, it is important to weigh environmental concerns, energy diversity, price stability, and technological development. While solar and wind have limitations today, ongoing advancements could make them major contributors in the future, including in areas like space-based energy collection. A mix of energy sources is key to building a resilient and sustainable energy system.

Title: Americans’ Shifting Views on Energy Issues

  • A majority of Americans (57%) still prioritize renewable energy over fossil fuels, but support has declined significantly from 79% in 2020.
  • The shift is largely driven by partisan differences: only 28% of Republicans now favor renewables, while 71% prioritize fossil fuels; Democrats continue to strongly support renewable energy.
  • Americans’ views on the federal government’s role in energy are mixed, with some decline in support for promoting renewable energy and more openness toward fossil fuel development.
  • Perceptions of renewable energy—especially among Republicans—have become more negative, with increased concerns about cost, reliability, and environmental impact.
  • Interest in electric vehicles remains moderate (32%), while hybrids are more appealing (44%), indicating shifting consumer preferences in transportation energy use.

Pew Research Center. (2026, April 3). Americans’ shifting views on energy issues. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2026/04/03/americans-shifting-views-on-energy-issues/

It is Not the Lack of Good People That Undermines Institutional Integrity (The Story of the Clan)

Integrity is important because it builds trust and strengthens overall institutional performance. However, it is often treated as a buzzword—something that looks good in theory but is not consistently practiced. Many factors influence whether individuals, and those under their authority, choose ethical behavior over self-interest.

Consider the hypothetical “Story of the Clan,” an allegory that illustrates both the presence and absence of integrity within an institution. In this scenario, manipulative and self-interested individuals learn to exploit their positions and networks for personal gain, even if it harms others. Over time, these behaviors become normalized, creating a toxic culture where misconduct is not only tolerated but embedded.

(Illustrative)

"It is the mark of an educated man
to be able to entertain a thought
without accepting it."
Socrates

This creates a fundamental problem: an institution that is meant to uphold legal and moral standards instead drifts into corruption and exclusion. In the story, certain groups—such as minorities, veterans, the elderly, and children—become targets if they do not conform. Serious violations of core rights emerge, driven by a focus on identity over principle.

Even when wrongdoing becomes widely known and victims come forward, the consequences persist. Some decision-makers begin to view people as more or less deserving based on superficial traits rather than shared principles or contributions. As a result, those responsible for misconduct may be protected or even rewarded, while accountability is avoided. Efforts to conceal wrongdoing further erode trust, and higher levels of oversight may reflect the same divisions.

In contrast, an alternative version of the story highlights what institutional integrity should look like. In this scenario, leaders recognize that all individuals have inherent value, and they act in ways that uphold fairness and justice. Integrity becomes the foundation for trust, and institutions strive toward the highest ethical standards. Surveys, collaboration, recruitment and metrics of trust rise. Those committed to justice work to correct wrongdoing, even when others resist.

This contrast underscores the importance of institutional integrity. When systems are influenced by extreme partisanship, external pressures (PACS that foster manipulation and misinformation), social influence, or a lack of accountability, they risk violating fundamental rights such as freedom of speech and religion. Tax dollars are misused to support foundational erosion. A failure to uphold ethical responsibilities can lead to long-term harm. This is why you should pick the best and brightest and not the most connected. 

Because this is a learning story, the ending is open. One possibility is that the majority of principled individuals take a stand, challenge harmful behavior, and protect future victims. Yet even then, unresolved issues may remain if systems fail to hold all actors accountable. The core challenge is not the absence of good people, but the lack of effective checks and balances for those who abandon ethical principles in favor of power, loyalty, or ideology.

This hypothetical scenario invites reflection. There may not be a single “right” conclusion, but there are more and less constructive ways to respond. Ultimately, time and accountability reveal the consequences of choices made—for individuals and institutions alike. What do you think?

Integrity: What It Is and Why It Is Important

  • Integrity is a central concept in governance and public administration, increasingly emphasized in both research and policymaking contexts.
  • The concept of integrity is not singular; it includes multiple interpretations, with at least eight distinct perspectives identified in the literature.
  • Integrity is closely connected to related ideas such as ethics, corruption, and good governance, and should be understood alongside these frameworks rather than as a replacement.
  • It plays a crucial role in understanding how institutions function and maintain legitimacy, particularly within public sector organizations.
  • Integrity should be embedded within existing ethical theories and governance approaches to strengthen both theoretical development and practical application.
  • The article highlights the need for more empirical research to better understand how integrity operates in real-world governance settings.
  • Overall, integrity is positioned as a foundational element for improving accountability, reducing corruption, and promoting effective governance systems.

Huberts, L. W. J. C. (2018). Integrity: What it is and why it is important. Public Integrity, 20(Sup1), S18–S32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1477404

Tuesday, April 7, 2026

Advanced Report Durable Goods Manufacturing February 2026-Uncertainty

(Illustrative Only)

Trying to find 
the trajectory.

Circular thinking. 

Decisions During
Uncertainty
Goods declined over February 2026, with some of the change possibly driven by market speculation and general concerns geopolitical issues, decoupling about economic trends. Notable decreases included new orders, which fell 1.4%, and declines in manufacturing, particularly in non-defense aircraft parts.

On the other hand, some sectors showed growth. Metals experienced increased demand, computers are growing, and motor vehicle parts remained stable.

While the overall picture is uncertain, it highlights the importance of focusing on fundamentals, including manufacturing, production, human capital and infrastructure improvements, as the market adjusts and plans become clearer.

Monthly Advance Report on Durable Goods Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders (April 07, 2026)

• This page presents the Monthly Advance Report from the U.S. Census Bureau on durable goods manufacturers’ shipments, inventories, and orders for February 2026, including preliminary statistical estimates.
• The report shows new orders for manufactured durable goods decreased by $4.4 billion (1.4 percent) in February 2026, following a January decline.
• On an adjusted basis, new orders excluding transportation rose modestly (0.8 percent), while new orders excluding defense declined (1.2 percent).
• Transportation equipment was a primary factor in the downturn, with a $6.1 billion (5.4 percent) decrease in orders.
• The page links to accompanying data tables for shipments, new orders, unfilled orders and inventory, and advance total manufacturing estimates.

United States Census Bureau. (2026, April 7). Monthly Advance Report on Durable Goods Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders. https://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/adv/current/index.html