Sailboat on an Ocean Painting: The Creative Lens of Art for Business Benefit

Art is a hobby—I never claimed to be a masterpiece myself. I just try to get a little better here and there, and every once in a while, someone actually pays me for it (which still surprises me every time). It has been a while since anyone bought anything so maybe I'm getting worse. :(

The funny thing is, art isn’t just about making something look nice—it kind of rewires how you think. Our brains get comfortable using the same “lens” to see the world, filtering out anything that doesn’t fit. Art forces you to mess with that lens. You start noticing things you normally ignore, and eventually realize… you probably don’t understand nearly as much as you thought. Very humbling. Also slightly inconvenient.

It’s similar to learning anything new. At first, you know just enough to be confidently wrong. Then over time—through reading, thinking, and experience—you build layers of understanding. Art just speeds up that process by training you to make weird, unexpected connections. Suddenly, a problem at work starts looking like a painting… which is either very insightful or a sign you need more sleep.

That’s why people who dabble in art tend to be a bit more open-minded. You get used to seeing multiple possibilities instead of just one “correct” answer. And that can actually help with business, strategy, and problem-solving—turns out creativity isn’t just for galleries.

Anyway, the piece I’m sharing is a ship on the ocean at night. I threw in some flowers along the shore because I felt like experimenting with beach foliage. No deeper meaning—just vibes.

If you’re interested, send me a message with an offer, or you can grab it on eBay. I usually donate part of what I make and keep about half. And on the rare occasion something sells, it absolutely makes my day—so if you feel like being someone’s hero today, you know what to do. 

eBay Art  and Art Page

Sailboat on an Ocean
Acrylic 11X13" canvas board
Can provide with or without
frame.

Title: The Art of Creativity

The article explains that creativity is a universal, learnable process involving stages of preparation, incubation, insight, and application, where openness, reduced self-censorship, and engagement with unconscious thought enable individuals to generate novel ideas, while factors like fear, rigid thinking, and external pressure inhibit creative expression; it emphasizes that creativity exists in everyday life, thrives through experimentation, play, and “flow” states, and can be developed by challenging assumptions, embracing mistakes, and fostering supportive environments.

Goleman, D., & Kaufman, P. (1992). The art of creativity. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/199203/the-art-creativity

Reclaiming Institutional Integrity: Values, Bias, and Moral Courage in Society (The Story of the Clan)

(Illusrative Only)

"Avoid doing what you
would blame others for doing."
—Thales

In our thought
experiment we use
what is called a 
mirror. The
perpetrators interpreted
ambigious cues in
the environment based
on their latent
beliefs. However, 
they skipped over 
the alternative explanations
as a hueristic
blindspot. 

Nations can
be built off the 
principles of the Enlightenment.
We should preserve
those beliefs.

Allegory of the Cave

Society grows when we build institutions that protect our core values, like freedom of speech, religion, and the pursuit of happiness. Laws, constitutions, and rights are meant to ensure these values guide all decisions. When they begin to veer off path due to bigotries, ignorance and misguided nationalistic perspective the problems compound as central values (upholding which indicates patriotism) to the core purpose of existence are undermined.

The hypothetical, philosophical learning Story of the Clan shows what happens when tainted officials misuse these systems for self, identity, and forced religious views. Harmful behaviors were encouraged, victims were exploited, and extremists used institutions to promote exclusion and bigotry. Patriotism is about shared values and inclusion, while nationalism focuses on identity and often excludes others. The two came head to head but only one should come out as the leading direction (Identity vs. Principles).

Officials and citizens within our thought experiment did act to protect victims, but clan affiliated courts failed to stop wrongdoing because it was easier to blame the victims than correct misteps. Other victims came forward and those who reported potentially illegal and harmful behaviors were quickly retaliated againsts, their privacy and rights violated, and given a stern threat about the risks of standing for their oaths and values in the future (A precursor to selling out of our values on a wider scale). Implicit biases and self-interest allowed injustice to continue, discouraging people from speaking out on an official and unofficial level.

From a learning perspective let us say that while the dysfunction was seeded decades ago but such overt behaviors started five years ago as a metric to a future unknown. That future has continued to unfold. 

Over time, awareness and knowledge have helped expose these problems. While extremists still exist, most courts try to uphold justice. Some do not when bias has infected their decision making. Most can overcome the more grotesque forms of hate (i.e. slavery and dehumanization such as calling people "dogs"). Yet political influence and personal interests can still distort outcomes. We all benefit when we encourage systems to align to shared oaths, values, social contracts, and rights. Ones race, religion, political perspective, opinion, etc. and perceived societal value is still being debated in connected circles. 

The key lesson is that correcting wrongdoing takes moral courage. Ignoring injustice lets it continue, while taking action can protect victims and strengthen society. It comes with risks. Our learning story has a positive ending because many begin to see themselves through a less distorted mirror that helps them reflect on their mistakes and opportunities. Others you can't teach no matter what happens and that will run its course in our society. However, overall it will continue to strive and those who undermine those strivings have a higher likelihood of accountability then they did just a few generations ago. 

What type of future would you like to see? Who is included, excluded? What is the long-term impact (positive or negative) if we do not rally everyone to the same shared principles? Are there economic or sociological risk to one over another?There is no correct or incorrect answers so long as you thought out it. The purpose of the thought experiment. Take with a grain of salt.

You may be interested in this article,

Title: Getting Explicit About Implicit Bias in the Courts

• Implicit bias refers to unconscious stereotypes or associations that can influence judgment without deliberate awareness, and judges—like most people—possess these biases.
• Research shows that judges often avoid acting on bias when race or identity is explicitly presented, but subtle cues can still influence decisions, leading to disparities in areas like sentencing.
• Bias in the justice system is cumulative, occurring at multiple stages (policing, prosecution, and sentencing), which helps explain broader disparities even if individual judges try to remain impartial.
• Judges tend to overestimate their ability to remain unbiased, highlighting the importance of self-awareness, feedback, and structured decision-making processes.
• Strategies to reduce implicit bias include deliberate decision-making, using objective criteria, increasing diversity, seeking training, and actively questioning assumptions to promote fairness in judicial outcomes.

Rachlinski, J. J., Wistrich, A. J., & Donald, B. B. (2020–2021). Getting explicit about implicit bias. Judicature, 104(3). https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/getting-explicit-about-implicit-bias/?

Why Nature Matters in Industry, Life, and Health: Lessons from Michigan’s Upper Peninsula

Nature plays a significant role in our lives, whether we realize it or not. Communities surrounded by natural environments often experience better health outcomes, lower crime rates, and stronger overall well-being compared to areas that have become overly industrialized. Finding the balance is vital for sustained long term health. 

While industry is essential for economic growth and community development, it should not come at the expense of the natural environment. With thoughtful planning, industry and nature can coexist in ways that support both economic progress and environmental sustainability. The goal should be to improve quality of life for everyone—through better wages, job opportunities, and community development—while also preserving the natural spaces that support our physical and mental health.

Near Marqutte
If your interested in this photo
send me a message to the right
with an offer. Different sizes
framed and unframed available.

Too often, development prioritizes short-term gains that benefit a small number of people, while contributing to environmental degradation and growing inequality. As wealth becomes more concentrated, many individuals see little meaningful improvement in their daily lives. This highlights the need for a more balanced approach that values both economic and environmental well-being.

Spending time in nature—through activities like hiking, walking, or biking—not only enhances physical fitness but also supports mental health. These experiences are part of what make places like Michigan’s Upper Peninsula such desirable places to live and invest in. You may be interested in this article on protecting some sensitive nature areas in the UP. Protecting Nature in MI

I'm also a licensed fitness trainer so if you are interested in some virtual or local fitness training let me know by sending a message to the right. A nutrition plan and a routine can go a long way.  Likewise, I do some hobby art and photography so if you are interested in the picture above let me know for the size and frame/unframed. You can send along an offer or I can provide you with a delivered cost. Thanks for reading. 

Viewing Nature: An Analysis of Exposure to Nature in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula

• Exposure to nature improves physical and mental health, including reducing stress and improving focus
• Nature can be experienced directly (outdoors) or indirectly (through windows or views)
• Access to trees and green space is linked to lower rates of depression and anxiety
• Higher tree density is associated with reduced use of antidepressants
• Tree cover varies across Upper Peninsula communities, with some cities having much lower coverage than others
• Downtown areas generally have less tree coverage than residential neighborhoods
• Lower tree density is connected to poorer overall health outcomes
• Increasing tree cover is a cost-effective way to improve public health and quality of life

Broadway, M., & Brown, J. (2026, January 26). Viewing nature: An analysis of exposure to nature in the Upper Peninsula. Rural Insights. https://ruralinsights.org/content/viewing-nature-an-analysis-of-exposure-to-nature-in-the-upper-peninsula/

Thayer, K. (2025, June 24). Protecting nature in Michigan. Environmental Law & Policy Center. https://elpc.org/blog/protecting-nature-in-michigan/

Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory that Includes Motivation and Hygiene

Illustrative Only

Employee motivation is one of the most important drivers of success in any organization. When employees are motivated, they are more likely to work hard, put forward their best effort, and contribute to growth and development. This motivation is not only for the benefit of the employer but also for the individual, as many people have a natural desire to achieve and improve. However, motivation varies—most individuals are driven by intrinsic factors but avoid negative feelings through hygiene motivations. 

One useful framework for understanding this dynamic is Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, also known as the motivation–hygiene theory. This theory distinguishes between intrinsic motivators and extrinsic hygiene factors. Intrinsic motivators are tied to the work itself and are key to increasing job satisfaction. These include opportunities for achievement, recognition, autonomy, meaningful work, and personal growth. Employees who experience these factors often feel fulfilled and genuinely satisfied in their roles. Social connections and a sense of belonging within the workplace can also contribute to this internal satisfaction.

In contrast, hygiene factors are external conditions that are necessary to prevent dissatisfaction but do not necessarily create motivation. These include fair pay, effective supervision, clear and reasonable company policies, good working conditions, and job security. When these factors are inadequate, employees are more likely to become dissatisfied and may eventually leave the organization, leading to lower retention.

Overall, organizations are most effective when they address both sets of factors. They must ensure that basic employee needs are met through strong hygiene practices while also fostering an environment that promotes intrinsic motivation. At the same time, individuals can contribute by cultivating a well-rounded life that supports their own sense of motivation and fulfillment.

Title: Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory (Motivation–Hygiene Theory)

• Developed by Frederick Herzberg to explain workplace motivation and job satisfaction
• Proposes that satisfaction and dissatisfaction are driven by two separate sets of factors, not opposite ends of one continuum
• Two main categories: motivators (intrinsic) and hygiene factors (extrinsic)
• Motivators (satisfiers):
  • Lead to job satisfaction and increased motivation
  • Related to the nature and content of the work itself
  • Examples include achievement, recognition, responsibility, advancement, and personal growth
  • Their presence creates satisfaction, but their absence does not necessarily cause dissatisfaction
• Hygiene factors (dissatisfiers):
  • Prevent dissatisfaction but do not create true satisfaction
  • Related to the work environment and external conditions
  • Examples include salary, company policies, supervision, working conditions, and job security
  • Poor hygiene factors lead to dissatisfaction, while adequate ones create a neutral state
• Key concept: improving hygiene factors alone will not motivate employees; motivators are required for true engagement
• Emphasizes that organizations must address both sets of factors to improve performance and satisfaction
• Practical implication:
  • First eliminate dissatisfaction (fix hygiene issues)
  • Then enhance satisfaction (add motivators such as growth and recognition)

Nickerson, C. (2025, April 18). Herzberg’s two-factor theory of motivation-hygiene. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/herzbergs-two-factor-theory.html

March 2026 Jobs Report 178k+: Are there ways to increase labor participation rates?

(Illustrative Only)

Technology comes with
benefits and detractors.
It can increase the
labor participation rate
if human capital is
developed with a
human-tech pairing.
Likewise, it can harm
workers on the lower
income levels if training
and thoughtfulness
do not come forward. 
Yes greed is still alive
and active so a balance
is needed.
There is a way to increase
labor rates but that would 
require a level of 
coordination among 
employers, policy makers,
training, education
and people.

Digital Impact on Labor

We are on the cusp of 
change. Positive or
negative outcomes
is a series of choices
and options. 

Economic Platforms

Einstein Economy

The March 2026 jobs report shows an increase of approximately 178,000 jobs, with much of the growth concentrated in the healthcare sector. Part of this increase reflects workers returning to their jobs following recent strikes, which contributed to the sector’s strong gains (Yes, expensive healthcare.).

Healthcare continues to be a major driver of employment. As a large and expanding industry, it generates substantial revenue and sustained demand for labor. At the same time, ongoing concerns about rising healthcare costs point to broader policy and structural challenges that may need to be addressed in the future.

Overall, employment growth appears relatively steady, without significant month-to-month volatility. While job gains remain positive, the pace of growth over the past year has been modest. This slower rate of increase may signal a cooling in the broader economy, though not necessarily a sharp downturn. That is dependent on many domestic and foreign issues going forward so it is an open risk.

In general, job growth is closely tied to economic performance and GDP. Higher employment typically supports higher production and, in turn, economic growth. However, advances in technology complicate this relationship, as productivity gains allow more output with fewer workers. These effects are often relative to competitive pressures across industries. Additionally, improvements in the labor force participation rate could further support growth, reinforcing the importance of continued investment in human capital development.

Overall Direction: Increase (but slowing) March to March

• 2024 → 2025:
  ➤ Increase of ~800,000 jobs (solid growth)
• 2025 → 2026:
  ➤ Increase of ~200,000 jobs (very slow growth)

U.S. Employment Situation Summary – Health Care and Ambulatory Services Growth (March 2026)

• Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 178,000 jobs in March 2026.
• The health care sector added 76,000 jobs, continuing to be a major driver of employment growth.
• Ambulatory health care services accounted for a significant portion of this growth, adding 54,000 jobs.
• Job gains were driven by health care (+54,000), construction (+26,000), and transportation and warehousing (+21,000).
• Within ambulatory services, offices of physicians contributed 35,000 new jobs, partly due to workers returning after a strike.
• Hospitals also saw employment gains of 15,000 jobs during the same period.
• Over the previous 12 months, health care employment grew steadily, averaging 29,000 new jobs per month.
• Labor participation rate 61.9%

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2026, April 3). The employment situation—March 2026. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

Leadership Style, Adaptability, and Organizational Success in Times of Change

 

Organizational leadership is a critical factor in how effectively an organization adapts to evolving market demands. Strong leaders establish a clear vision and direction while actively listening to employees and leadership teams to generate innovative solutions and encourage engagement across the organization.

Certain leadership traits are more effective than others during periods of change. Leaders must create a compelling vision that aligns with organizational values and mission, while also translating that vision into actionable steps that position the organization strategically for long-term success. This alignment enables organizations to respond to market shifts and capitalize on emerging opportunities.

Organizations that adapt quickly and effectively tend to outperform others, particularly when they identify and execute successful strategies. In contrast, stagnant organizations often struggle due to a lack of input, motivation, and leadership capable of driving progress.

Importantly, rigid leadership styles can hinder progress when adaptability and transformation are required. When leaders fail to adjust their approach to meet changing conditions, the effectiveness of change initiatives may decline, ultimately impacting organizational growth.

This highlights a key insight: who is selected for leadership roles—and how they lead—directly influences organizational success. Prioritizing capable, forward-thinking individuals over those chosen primarily for connections increases the likelihood of effective leadership. This is especially important as organizations navigate ongoing shifts, including the integration of AI technologies and the need to continuously adapt to a changing market landscape.

Effectiveness of Leadership Styles in Organizational Change Management

Leadership styles examined:

• Transformational leadership – emphasizes vision, motivation, and innovation
• Transactional leadership – focuses on structure, rewards, and performance
• Authoritarian (autocratic) leadership – centralized control and decision-making
• Democratic/participative leadership – encourages employee involvement
• Laissez-faire leadership – minimal supervision with high autonomy
• Servant leadership – prioritizes employee well-being and development
• Strategic leadership – aligns long-term vision with organizational goals
• Bureaucratic leadership – relies on rules and formal procedures
• Consultative leadership – gathers input but retains final authority

Key findings / results of the study:

• Leadership style significantly influences the success of organizational change efforts
• Transformational leadership is the most effective style for managing change due to its ability to inspire and reduce resistance
• Participative leadership improves employee engagement, commitment, and acceptance of change
• Clear and consistent communication from leaders reduces uncertainty during transitions
• Emotional intelligence enhances leaders’ ability to manage resistance and employee reactions
• Flexible and adaptive leadership approaches perform better in complex environments
• Rigid leadership styles, such as authoritarian or bureaucratic, are generally less effective unless high control is required

APA Reference:

Keerthana, S., & Jayasri, V. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of leadership styles in organizational change management. Shanlax International Journal of Management, 11(S1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.34293/management.v11iS1-Mar.7997

The Impact of Patriotism vs. Nationalism on Judicial Outcomes and Society (Patriots vs. Nationalists)

(Illustrative Only)

Patriots vs. Nationalists

We continue to examine how well-functioning courts benefit society both socially and economically. As one pillar of a three-part system, the judiciary plays a critical role in shaping public trust. While courts are generally viewed as functional, concerns about bias and declining confidence remain significant. Thus we can learn from hypothetical stories designed to delve into the problem and find solutions. It is important to strengthen all institutions around shared principles as much as possible because there are long term synergistic outcomes that benefit society as a whole economically and socially (We can cover in more detail on how justice and other factors influence growth). Politics and parties should not be a greater stakeholder than the needs of people. 

To explore these issues, consider a philosophical thought experiment—the “Story of the Clan” scenario—which illustrates how systems can fail when extremism and corruption intersect. In this scenario, wrongdoing becomes normalized: individuals are targeted regardless of status—whether veterans, the elderly, intellectuals, spiritual guides or others—and exploitation is driven by financial gain and entrenched favoritism. Whistleblowers face retaliation, vulnerable groups are put at risk, those upholding oaths put on lists and actors who were supposed to be good stewards of institutional resources misused resources to help friends and harm others. Such dynamics reinforce dysfunction and erode trust and appear to have created numerous victims over time.

Yet, the scenario also highlights a path toward correction. As awareness grows, individuals within the system begin to realign with their foundational values—honoring their oaths and reaffirming commitments to fairness, accountability, and equal protection. This shift reflects a deeper distinction between patriotism and nationalism. The muddy cloud becomes more clear as patriotism to values begins to differentiate nationalism of identity. Patriots and nationalists have different purposes and focuses of which one is strengthened when people pull together and the other fostered when people pull apart.

Patriotism, in this context, represents a commitment to shared principles: civil liberties, freedom of speech and religion, and equal access to justice. Nationalism, by contrast, can manifest as exclusionary thinking—where rights and protections are unevenly applied, and bias is tolerated or even justified. People often interchange the words but they are different. One is constructive and sustaining; the other risks becoming corrosive and divisive. We must always seek to strengthen society and not fall into the pits others have. 

The broader lesson is that institutional strength depends on continuous accountability. Courts must actively confront bias, reject partisanship, and foster critical thinking to maintain legitimacy. Trust is not self-sustaining—it is earned through consistent adherence to principles of justice. While systems can evolve and improve, those who contribute to wrongdoing must still be held accountable. Without that accountability, public confidence will continue to decline. Consider which will foster greater growth and which will limit the positive benefits of societal resources as funneled through institutions (Similar misused like corruption and that is why hate and corruption follow similar neurological pathways around self-interest and lack of empathy).

Ultimately, a system grounded in shared values and ethical responsibility can endure across generations. Even when challenged, it is the commitment to those principles—not the loudest or most extreme voices—that determines whether the system remains a force for stability and fairness. When we do the right thing and people in positions of authority act with integrity we will find shared societal growth and commitment to the health and strength of our communities and societies. Thus commitment to shared principles should increase economic and social growth while increases in nationalism should slow down economic and social growth. One encourages engagement and the other encourages disengagement. 

*This is a hypothetical, philosphical thought experiment so take with a grain of salt and come to whatever conclusion you wish. There is no right or wrong answer as long as you have thought about it. If we are learning we are growing.

Getting Explicit About Implicit Bias in the Courts

• Implicit bias refers to unconscious mental associations or stereotypes that operate automatically and can influence judgment without awareness or intent.
• Judges, like most individuals, possess implicit biases (e.g., racial or gender associations), but professional norms and awareness can help them avoid acting on these biases in decision-making.
• Research shows that bias is more likely to influence decisions when cues are subtle or indirect, whereas explicit awareness of factors like race can reduce biased outcomes.
• Implicit bias can still affect judicial outcomes in areas such as sentencing and evaluations, particularly when cases involve ambiguity or rely on intuition rather than structured analysis.
• Addressing implicit bias requires deliberate strategies, including increased awareness, training, and institutional safeguards, to promote fairness and maintain public confidence in the justice system.

References (APA):
Rachlinski, J. J., Wistrich, A. J., & Donald, B. B. (2020). Getting explicit about implicit bias. Judicature, 104(3). https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/getting-explicit-about-implicit-bias/

Patriotism, Critical Thinking, and the Civil Liberties–National Security Tradeoff

*They are using what appears to be patriotism versus blind patriotism. Blind patriotism seems more akin to blind nationalism.

• The study distinguishes between constructive patriotism (reflective and questioning) and blind patriotism (unquestioning support), showing they influence political attitudes in different ways.
• Critical thinking is positively associated with constructive patriotism and negatively associated with blind patriotism, suggesting that more analytical individuals are more likely to question government actions.
• Individuals high in blind patriotism tend to prioritize national security over civil liberties, while those high in constructive patriotism are more supportive of protecting civil liberties.
• The relationships between patriotism types and political values are significant but differ in direction, with blind patriotism more strongly linked to security-focused attitudes.
• Broader factors such as militarism, political ideology, and support for war are interconnected with patriotism and help explain how individuals balance security concerns and individual freedoms.

References (APA):
Williams, R. L., Foster, L. N., & Krohn, K. R. (2008). Relationship of patriotism measures to critical thinking and emphasis on civil liberties versus national security. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8(1), 139–156. https://www.academia.edu/26190076/Relationship_of_Patriotism_Measures_to_Critical_Thinking_and_Emphasis_on_Civil_Liberties_versus_National_Security