Justice matters beyond legal technicalities. When the justice system and politics are dominated by lawyers, the law can become a game where technical rules replace core principles. A hyper-focus on fine detail obscures the primary goal of the law: true fairness and justice. Not that lawyers are all good or bad but they are limited by their occupation perspective to win even if it costs everyone else.
![]() |
| (Illustrative Only) |
The incentives of playing games versus the collective good that comes from doing the right thing (Notice that within this game playing of technicalities are the darker side of human nature such as rhetorical vanity, benefits, partisan incentives, etc. while society benefits more from the deeper fundamental approaches offered by philosophy.)
To fix this, lawmakers and judges must let the underlying purpose of the law guide their decisions rather than getting lost in procedural mechanics:
Preventing Ongoing Harm: Legal tools should stop corruption and wrongdoing, not provide technical loopholes for bad actors to exploit.
Protecting Victims: When systems play technical games, bad actors escape accountability while victims carry the burden. Merely avoiding liability or finding the easiest exit leaves harm unaddressed and rewards bad behavior.
Justice is not about finding technicalities to win a game—it is about keeping the fundamental purpose as your north star. If you loose that then the first (in-group) and second (out-group) class citizenship forms. Once that is an implicit value assumption the harm to society and the principles of freedom clearer.
*The Allegory of the Clan is a hypothetical thought experiment designed to foster thinking. Feel free to reject, change, etc.





