In the past, some judges and leaders rationalized injustice by convincing themselves they were serving a higher moral purpose. For example, there were those who believed they could “save” others souls while simultaneously dehumanizing them—justifying practices like slavery based on distorted cultural or religious views. Who saved their souls? Today, similar risks remain. Bias—whether racial, religious, or political—can still influence decision-making, sometimes unintentionally, and lead to unequal treatment under the law. Fundamental violations that lead to a decline of trust. Encouraging true north values and foundational beliefs in positions of authority supports the foundations of a healthy society (Lists or no lists).
To be clear, most individuals within the justice system aim to do the right thing. They work to support their communities and uphold fairness. However, when failures sometimes occur, the damage caused by a minority of bad actors can be significant. In some cases, oversight mechanisms appear weak, and accountability can be slow or inconsistent. This creates conditions where misconduct may persist longer than it should. Sometimes for years and years of blind eye encouragement.
Consider a hypothetical philosophical thought experiment learning scenario: a closed judicial system influenced by a group driven by racial, religious and in some cases political bias. In such a system, constitutional rights are ignored, misconduct is shielded, and vulnerable individuals are targeted or neglected. When challenged by those seeking fairness and accountability, retaliation follows—through intimidation, threats, or inaction. Coordinated reputational harm and enrichment from corruption and hate. While allegorical, this kind of scenario reflects patterns that have appeared in different forms throughout history. It highlights how easily systems can be distorted when bias and corruption go unchecked. Encouraging us to think more independently and thoughtfully about the legacy we leave behind.
The key lesson is that individuals often operate within cognitive frameworks, shaped by bias and belief. Fostered by groups, politics, and political monies. Without strong safeguards, even harmful systems can be rationalized by those within them. This is why protections—constitutional rights, checks and balances, and accountability structures—must not only exist but function effectively for everyone. It is a duty to improve where improvement is needed when aligning to these shared values.
Despite these challenges, in this example there is reason for optimism. Most people genuinely want to do what is right, and societies can learn from past defaults. Social movements and the frequency of upheavals have demonstrated the consequences of injustice, reinforcing the need for reform. For example, a survey by the National Judicial College found that 65% of judges believe racism still exists within the justice system, and many support continued reform. While not a scientific study, it reflects an awareness within the judiciary that improvements are still needed and there is a lot who want to do the right thing (Always support the people doing the right thing. If you don't support them those with darker souls move in to fill the void.).
Moving forward, the goal should be to strengthen justice systems so they can better identify misconduct without mislabeling individuals based on race, religion, or political belief. Core rights—such as those protected by constitutions and bills of rights—must be upheld consistently, not selectively. Reform should focus on building transparent, accountable, and resilient institutions that serve all members of society fairly. We want them to be effective in catching the "bad guys" even if they find them in the mirror (There is a mirror theory based on choices and how people selectively take in information to make choices in this thought experiment).
Ultimately, this is not about political parties, special interest groups, or competing narratives. It is about shared values—how people choose to live, govern, and treat one another. A sense of indivisibility over the the value of life and liberty. Those who honor their responsibilities, feel a sense of responsibility to foster the gains from generational striving, and uphold justice contribute to stronger, more effective systems. Everything else is secondary. Or at least it should be. 🤷 Good people are good people no matter their position within society. Vote your conscious wisely. It is a party neutral statement. If you are not sure of who to vote for then cast a vote for an independent to change up the kinds of decisions being made. 🙇
Survey of Judges Indicates Majority Believe Criminal Justice System Suffers from Racism
Non-scientific but still in alignment with other studies.
- A survey conducted by the National Judicial College found that 65% of 634 responding judges believe systemic racism exists in the U.S. criminal justice system.
- The survey was informal and based on a single question sent to judicial alumni, meaning results are not considered conclusive scientific research.
- Many judges indicated that racism within the system is often implicit or unconscious, rather than overt or intentional.
- Over 200 judges provided written comments, frequently pointing to implicit bias as influencing decision-making and contributing to disparities.
- Some judges linked systemic racism to higher incarceration rates among Black Americans and other minorities compared to white individuals.
- A minority of judges disagreed, arguing that while individual bias may exist, the system itself is not inherently racist.
- The findings highlight ongoing discussions within the judiciary about bias, fairness, and potential reforms in the justice system.
National Judicial College. (2020, July 20). Survey of judges says the majority believe the criminal justice system suffers from racism. https://www.judges.org/news-and-info/survey-of-judges-says-the-majority-believe-the-criminal-justice-system-suffers-from-racism/




